April 14, 2019

First published April 13, 2019

 in Mumbai Mirror

Not quite division of labour

Published on 14th April, 2019, in Mumbai Mirror.

Many assert that the caste system (jati pratha) is essentially ‘division of labour’. However, this will never be said by those involved in manual scavenging, cleaning sewers without proper gear, being forced to take up this job because that is the only vocation made available to them. When we use the phrase ‘division of labour’, it means all forms of labour are respected equally and people can choose to be whatever they want to be. Manual scavenging is never a choice. Is it aspirational to be a doctor, or a janitor? Globally, labour is not treated equally.

Some jobs pay more, some jobs are respected more, some jobs are more aspirational than others. If all jobs were equally aspirational, we could talk about division of labour.

But while the caste system is easy to criticise, our understanding of it remains limited, as academicians and politicians and activists see it through the lens of equality: everybody is equal before the law and everyone must get equal opportunities from the State. This idea of equality comes to us from Abrahamic mythology where all creatures are born equal in the eyes of God and live one life, equally obliged to follow God’s commandments. Those who do not follow God’s commandments go to hell.

In modern politics, the State is God, created by the collective voice of the people. Its laws are commandments, created and modified by the people. This way of looking at the world did not exist in ancient India. Ancient India is based on karma. This is not the one and only life; therefore, we are not born with a clean slate. We are born with karmic baggage and we die with karmic baggage and this karmic baggage decides into which family we are born. Different communities have different gods and different ideologies. This is very different from a homogenous worldview where everyone has, or must have, the same God, and the same ideology, a belief that is common in right wing and left wing groups around the world.

Where there is diversity, there is bound to be hierarchy — economic and political. What is unique, and most disturbing, about caste hierarchy is the concept of purity, with some vocations being seen as purer than others, resulting in the practice of untouchability. We confuse caste with untouchability. That is like confusing identity with exploitation. They are two different things.

People also argue that the ‘original’ caste system was not determined by birth. The Bhagavad Gita is often quoted as stating: your varna (social role) is decided by your gunas (your qualities). But does that mean gunas decide who should be manual scavenger and who should be priest? Does the manual scavenger get the same respect as the priest? These are questions we don’t want to ask.

In traditional India, you were obliged to follow the family profession. The sons had to follow their father’s profession. Therefore, we find great tension, in ancient mythology, between sages who become warrior or warriors who become sages, charioteers who aspire to be archers, cowherds who wish to be kings. Choice does not exist in Indian society. The karma system does not allow you to have a choice. Again, choice is a very Christian concept, based on free will, where you choose God or Devil, or atheism.

The ‘upper’ castes who owned lands, and were literate, managed to secure jobs as bureaucrats in Mughal courts; though Islam believes in equality, Muslim kings of India realised there was value in respecting the caste system. Later, they got jobs in the offices of the East India Company. The British rulers as Christians, and creators of ‘liberal’ ideologies, believed in equality but had no problems reinforcing the caste system by making it part of the census. After independence, demands of democracy have ensured that castes serve as vote banks for politicians. Reservations may be powerful tool of social justice, but they are simultaneously a weapon to drive a wedge in the social fabric. Humans love inequality as it enables us to be powerful.

There are people who say caste system was created to establish inequality and legitimise exploitation. That is like saying Christianity and Islam were created to wipe out pagan polytheistic religions, that Capitalism was created to make the rich richer and that Socialism was created to establish mediocrity and destroy enterprise. In conspiracy theories, all systems turn into handmaidens of evil.


Recent Books

  • flowers of india book

    Flower of India: Ways of Seeing the Lotus

    In Flower of India, bestselling author and renowned mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik examines the lotus as one of the most pervasive and resonant symbols of the Indian subcontinent. Through its many avatars—as plant, resource, metaphor, design, and sacred form—he traces how the lotus has shaped India’s cultural imagination across history, religion, art, and everyday life. Concise…

  • astra shastra

    Astra Shastra: Weapons of the Hindu Gods

    Well-known mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik introduces young readers to the wonderful weapons of Hindu gods with his unique art and easy-to-read text…

  • Escape the Bakasura Trap : Let Contentment Fuel Your Growth

    This book re-discovers this path, first revealed by Hanuman in the Mahabharata. Insightful and inspiring, Escape the Bakasura Trap is another classic from one of our great mythologists and thinkers…

  • लंकेश: रावण संग एक रोमांचक यात्रा

    यह पुस्तक भारत के सबसे विख्यात महाकाव्य रामायण और इस कारण भारत के सबसे बड़े खलनायक, रावण, को विस्तार से जानने की राह खोलती है।…

Recent Posts

  • Re-centring the Hindu Goddess

    Re-centring the Hindu Goddess

    Re-centring the goddess is not anti-male. It is pro-ecosystem. It reminds us that festivals are contracts with land, water, animals, and labour — especially women’s labour. When we reduce Diwali to a warrior’s homecoming, we miss Lakshmi’s audit of how we earned, spent, hoarded, and gave. When we make Navaratri a fashion parade, we forget…

  • Today’s Sanatan Dharma prefers ‘trad’ Bhisma

    Today’s Sanatan Dharma prefers ‘trad’ Bhisma

    The Trans Bill signed by the President of India aligns with the commander of the Kauravas, not Krishna. The Kauravas were more aligned to Christian Evangelists, not “woke” Krishna…

  • Narada: the Original Provocateur

    Narada: the Original Provocateur

    Narada is Hindu mythology’s impish, itinerant sage. His presence in a story spells trouble. As a character, he plays a key role. He spotlights our love for gossip, our fragile ego, our competitive spirit, our yearning to measure ourselves against others, our refusal to be content…