Author, Speaker, Illustrator, Mythologist

Five For Draupadi

May 08, 2010 | Mahabharata.

Published in Crest, Times of India, 6 March 2010

The idea of one woman having many husbands does make most men feel inadequate, not least her husbands. Little wonder then Draupadi is one of the most popular and controversial heroines of Hindu mythology. But she is not the only woman with many husbands. Her mother-in-law, Kunti, knew many men: four gods (Surya, Yama, Vayu and Indra) besides her husband, Pandu. But unlike Draupadi, her association with the gods was not public knowledge. It was whispered in corridors not announced in courts. And they did not really count as they were not husbands, just child-providers. The scriptures refer to other women who had many husbands: Marisha, who married the ten Prachetas brothers and Jatila who was the common wife of seven sages.

In early societies with high infant mortality rate and short lifespan, polygamy was preferred to polyandry. When a man had many wives, the family could have more children than a woman who had many husbands. This value for fertility is one of the reasons why women were usually kept away in seclusion and safety, a practice that eventually led to the throttling of women’s rights. But polyandry had benefits too – sharing a wife assured sharing of property and no division of the land.

In temples, one does see gods with many wives: Shiva with Gauri and Ganga; Vishnu with Bhoo-devi and Sri-devi; Muruga with Valli and Sena. This is either accepted matter-of-factly or simply explained away using metaphysics. But there are no images of the Goddess with multiple husbands. Usually her doorkeepers, such as Kala Bhairav and Gora Bhairava, are described as her sons or servants. The idea of the Goddess with more than one husband is unacceptable. Even suggesting it is blasphemous.

Draupadi with her five husbands and an entire epic revolving around her stirs the imagination – makes us think of things that we otherwise dare not think. Women writers who write on Draupadi flirt with the possibilities but only at a psychological level. Recently a male writer dared explore the physical aspect of Draupadi’s intimacy with her husbands. Not surprisingly this has led to outrage and protests and calls for the book to be banned.

One hears of co-wives fighting over their husband’s affection. Did the husbands fight over Draupadi? The epic does not explicitly discuss this, but the possibility of jealously tearing the brothers apart is alluded to repeatedly. The sage Narada warns the Pandava brothers of conflict that can destroy their fraternal bond. Narada suggests that they make careful bedroom arrangements to allow equal and exclusive access to each husband for a limited period of time. Any brother who enters her chamber when she is supposed to be with another husband will have to perform penance. Arjuna does stumble in once while she is in the arms of Yudhishtira and so has to go on a pilgrimage to atone for his crime. During this ‘pilgrimage’, he ends up with three more wives.

Every brother has exclusive rights to Draupadi’s chambers for a year, and then has to wait for four years for the next turn. Why one whole year? Perhaps because it gave Draupadi enough time to bear a child for that husband without any issues of paternity. As we know from the epic, she did bear each of her husbands a son, five in all.

Before she moved to the next husband, Draupadi walks through fire to regain her virginity and purity. Such rules were never placed before polygamous husbands. But Draupadi had a rule of her own for her husbands. She makes it very clear to her husbands that they cannot bring any other wife into the same house. Thus all the Pandavas have other wives but these wives stay with their parents and the Pandavas have to travel out of the city to visit their other wives in the four years that Draupadi is intimate with the other brothers. The only exception is made for Krishna’s sister, Subhadra, who marries Arjuna.

In a dialogue with Krishna’s wife, Satyabhama, Draupadi explains how she serves her husbands and satisfies all their needs and makes herself indispensable, hence very loved. Draupadi comes across as a very practical woman who knows she has to work to ensure all her husbands love her and do not feel she favors any one of them. But in the final chapter of the epic, it is made clear that of all the husbands, she favors Arjuna the most – a crime for which she is sent to hell!

Stories are often told of how Draupadi came to have five husbands. Explanations are needed for a culture desperate to explain such a discomforting practice. One story goes that in her past life she was a sage’s wife; her insatiable sexual appetite led him to curse her that in her next life she would have five husbands. Another story tells us that she asked Shiva for a husband who was noble and strong and skilled with the bow and handsome and wise. Since no single man possesses all five traits, Shiva gave her five husbands instead each with one trait.

Yet, this woman with five husbands is dragged into court and disrobed in public. She wonders why this happened to her. A folklore states that Krishna had sent the perfect husband for her – one who would love and protect her all her life and be faithful to her. His name was Karna, but she rejected him because of his low caste. So, she ended up marrying a man who shared her with his brothers and failed to protect her when she needed him the most.

  • arzu

    i cant swallow the fact that Draupadi’s case was taken so normally by the elders in that age, whereas in this age it would have been the greatest crime and totally unacceptable in the society.

  • senthil

    Being a wife of five men, was the main reason cited by the Kauravas to molest Draupadi, tagging her as a prostitute. But God answers her prayer and protects her, showing that God doesn’t care about such relationships. It’s actually an irony, since in Rama avatar, He stressed on “eka pathni”- one man one woman and in Krishna avatar, He didn’t care about it. It’s Krishna who instructs Draupadi to marry Arjuna and reject Karna as a sudra.
    There is no reason for sharing Draupadi as each of them had their own wives like – Bhima – Hidimba, Arjuna – Subhadra. It proves that women were foolish even in those days.

    • http://godschildfoundation.org Shalini

      Mr. Senthil, it’s a shame that u made this comment- It proves that women were foolish even in those days. Remember when u want money u go to Maa Laxmi and when u want success and education u pray to Ma Sarswati, so I guess this tells who is more foolish….God bless u.

      • aarthi raghavan

        shalini is absolutely right.he is so foolish.

    • http://devdutt.com aruna

      MR.SENTHIL,

      DONT U FORGET YOU ARE BORN ON THIS BEAUTIFUL EARTH BECAUSE OF ONE WOMAN…

    • sagar

      Senthil, That is the very right thought. At that time, every one following the Dharma through vedas. How can they Marry one women to five as it is against vedas. Hence they did not marry Draupadi, but just Yudistar married her.

  • http://godownofmymind.blogspot.com/ Sourav Roy

    Wonderful article. What’s the name of the ‘outrageous’ book about Draupadi?

    • vijay

      Its DRAUPADI by some famous author translated to many indian languages.

    • vijay

      Its DRAUPADI by Yarlagadda Lakshmi Prasad in telugu that won Sahitya academy award.

      • http://godownofmymind.blogspot.com/ Sourav Roy

        Thanks. Hope I can find some English / Bengali translation somewhere.

  • Keshav

    @senthil -
    I’m not sure Krishna ever told Draupadi what to do. Wasn’t Draupadi married to the Pandavas at the beginning of the story before they ever meet Lord Krishna?

    How would she even know who he was at that time?

    Plus, this whole silly about her being punished and thus “disrobed” is kind of silly seeing as its assumed that the blue man himself saved her from humiliation.

    • aarthi raghavan

      vasudev and drupad were family friends.so,krishna and draupadi were friends even before he meets the pandavas.

  • http://shillika.wordpress.com Shillika

    I just wanted to add the version mentioned in the Amar Chitra Katha on Draupadi’s marriage to the five pandavas,

    Draupadi was the daughter of a rishi. Thought beautiful, chaste and accomplished she was fated to remain unmarried. She decided to pray to Lord Shiva and seek his blessing to triumph over her fate. After years of penance, Shiva is said to appeared before her and asked her, “What favour do you seek from me?”
    In uncontrolled eagerness she repeats her request five times, “An accomplished husband…”
    Shiva smiles, “So be it. You shall have five husbands from the Bharata princes” Confounded, she exclaims, “Lord It was only one husband I wanted.” Since Shiva’s word could not be revoked, he postpones the event to another life.

    It is also said that this story was narrated to the Pandavas by sage Vyasa when they were on their way from Ekachakrapura to Panchala.

    • Charanyan

      I doubt Amar Chitra Katha (ACK) is a credible source to be even quoted in this context. ACK is known to be notorious to censure any ‘inappropriate’ and politically incorrect content lest they should find their way into the impressionable minds – the kids. No wonder it is so loved and history is so clear and stain-free from the scope of ACK.

      Hence the explanation you cite is hardly has any veracity.

  • kjram

    Applying concepts to today’s times would be meaningless. In ancient times, the concept of marriage was not known and women were common property of the tribe. Therefore it is possible women had many ‘husbands’ and the duty of the woman was to bear children. Seen in that context it was neither blasaphemous or sacrilege for Draupadi to have married five.

  • shwetha

    It was yudhistra who could not control his desire for draupadi.she was extremely beautiful that all the other brothers wanted to marry her.They did not want their fraternal bonds broken and so made up silly excuses for marrying her.however,the epic does not clearly portray draupadi’s anger at Arjuna failing to protect her at that point of time.She is the epitome of intelligence ,sacrifice and courage.Condemning such a noble and pure woman is very wrong.

    • http://ashwanik.wordpress.com Ashwani

      Draupadi married Arjuna over Karna. She didnt married five husband at the ceremony. It was her saas “kunti” who mistakely told Pandavas to distribute the gift between them equally.

      Since It was ancient time and words could nit be taken back as we see in present. So she ended up with five husband’s.

  • Sud

    I have also heard about another story that one of the brothers got draupadi to show to Kunti and she without seeing what it was told to share it among all the 5 brothers. hence she got married to all 5 of them

  • Sud

    I have also heard about another story that one of the brothers got draupadi to show to Kunti and she without seeing what it was, told them to share it among all the 5 brothers. hence she got married to all 5 of them

  • Medha

    “But in the final chapter of the epic, it is made clear that of all the husbands, she favors Arjuna the most – a crime for which she is sent to hell! ”

    Draupadi doesn’t go to hell because she preferred Arjuna over others but its just that she falls down dead and doesn’t enter the ‘swarga’ alive like Yudhisthira does.
    This should be corrected :)

    • Chandra

      You may be wrong. The falling down has a reason which Yudhishtir explains to his brothers. He explains the fall of each one of them.

  • Jayesh

    Mahabharat is an epic poem. It did not really happen.

    Draupadi represents Laxmi. The 5 Pandav’s represent the 5 virtues in a human and the kauravs represent 100 bad virtues in a human.

    The 5 virtues are:
    Religion = Yudhistir
    Stength = Bhim
    Skill/Action = Arjun
    Knowledge = Nakul
    Politeness/Humbleness = Sahdev

    So this means that Laxmi goes to one who has all these 5 virtues.

    How wrongly we have all understood Mahabhart. There are several other arguements to support the above view point.

    • Ravi Jain

      Thanks for this Interesting view. Kind of put a lot of things in perspective. Please explain the Karna anthology in details. Thanks.

      • bharath

        wow isnt that a amazing point…

        i always wondered how can godess lakshmi be compared to Money which is virtual..

        anyways the point made by jayesh so interesting.. Lakshmi always refers to GOAL, we need to have all the 5 qualities to achieve a goal… correct me if i my understanding is wrong…do you guys think our ancestors put it that way :)

      • Jayesh Ashar

        Hi Ravi,
        Karna was born to Kunti before her marriage and hence she abandoned him. He depicts that such mistakes (the abandoning of a child) will always come back to haunt you.

        Karna was considered as a generous giver – the 6th virtue that a human being should have. However, this virtue never goes along well with the other 5 virtues and is at a logger head with them, as shown in Mahabharat.

    • Fireinmybelly

      Sahadev stands for knowledge and Nakul for beauty!

  • Dhananjay

    The anthology to karna at the end is a masterstroke! He’s my favorite character in the Mahabharata….come to think of it…in each of us resides a karna…to express him or not is one’s own preference!

    kewl article :D

    • Akanksha N.

      Karna is my character too! He is the perfect example of true human behavior. He was a devoted man, wonderful king and was willing to give up anything to achieve his goal. At the same time he had a dark side -he aided Duryodhan with all his evil plans.
      At last a character who is depicted like a God.

  • http://raghuonlife.blogspot.com Raghu Dharmendra

    Hi Devdutt,

    “Recently a male writer dared explore the physical aspect of Draupadi’s intimacy with her husbands. Not surprisingly this has led to outrage and protests and calls for the book to be banned.”

    Are you refering to the Kannada novel ‘Parva’ by S.L. Bhyrappa which is also been translated in English and all major languages of India?

    So, how are you doing? I cannot watch Business Sutra on CNBC but catching it up in here on your website. Thanks for uploading them. You look suave as always.

    Gyani says ‘Hi’

    Raghu

  • Gaurav

    I cannot believe how deep is the judgemental approach in talking about Draupadi. I just want to put myself in her shoes and go through Fire Birth,Swayamvar, Vastrapaharan, Vanavaas, Agyatavaas,The war,death of her 5 sons,The final journey on foot in the Himalyan mountains.

  • http://devdutt.com vinay

    Draupadi, symbolizes, the ‘male’ Ego of a MAN for a woman. We all wish we have the five qualities for the ‘woman’ we wish to imagine or fantasize, or spend our entire life with. The game of dice actually symbolizes the fate of a MAN, when he is just Helpless even when his prestige is dragged and almost……, the unthinkable. To give all this a human shade and an emotional quagmire, the characters are bursting with words. But come to think of it We as MALE are always confronted with such situations and are supposed to keep quiet. How many times have we read about a case of rape and gone to the police station or a hospital to help such women? the VASTRAHARAN, still continues.

  • Akanksha N.

    Well when we talk about Panchali why do many of us decide to overlook the fact whether she really had a choice. Well when Arjun won her hand it was Kunti who told him to share whatever he had got with is brothers (some say that Kunti knew that draupadi was going to be the reason of division in the family) but did Draupadi have an option? Could she have said NO? If she did Arjun would have left her. And in those times (and even now) a single woman, moreover a divorcee, have no reputation at all. Could she have possibly had a choice?

    • Devdutt

      She did choose to reject Karna

      • Akanksha N.

        Well her decision to reject Karna was to remain “true” to her kshatriya blood. (right or wrong im not gonna argue about that) But it still doesn’t answer if she could have chosen to leave her marriage behind and live with her father “disgraced”.

    • Aarthi Raghavan

      Yes! She did have a choice! Krishna tells her about her previous birth when she had asked Mahadev for a husband with five different characteristics – a person who should be a embodiment of dharma, strong, a skilled archer, handsome, and smart. However, it was impossible to have all these qualities in one person. But she insists Mahadev to give this boon & he gives it. So Krishna tells Draupadi that she had the choice to accept Mahadev’s boon or reject it & insult him. So it was her choice to marry all five of them.

      Remember, the society could have disrespected women, but not Krishna!

  • Supriya

    Actually, I read somewhere that it was Krishna who influenced Draupadi to reject Karna? Is that not true?
    Of course, with mythology, we can never be sure, I suppose all we can do is decide which version we like best.

    • vini

      hi supriya..
      ur rite.krishna told her to reject karna.its also said dat draupadi n karna loved each other secretly though unexpressed.n at d ent she fell down bcoz she had karna deep in her heart.yudhistir was aware of the fact but hid it for d sake of her reputation.

      • vini

        this is told by chitra divakaruni in her book “palace of illusions”.

  • KW

    Why is that during the Ramayana, we see more of Monogamy (in Ram, Laxman; except for Ram’s father), while in the Mahabharta there are relationships of multiple wives and husbands?

    • Devdutt

      Ramayana is Treta Yuga and Mahabharata is Dvapara Yuga ….different yugas, different rules

      • Abhishek Goel

        What are the rules for Kalyug?
        and Who will decide them?

        • aruna

          kalyug has no rules – each for his own

  • http://ihavenowebsite manoj nayak

    some points to notice, we are living in our time and trying to be the master of our past.

    mahabharata is not myth or simply poem, we have no evidence to prove it is myth.

    draupadi is not stupid or crazy. please study her wisdom when she spoke to her husband yudhishtira after their banishment. She was tough with the wrong doers and at the same time she was very kind to ashwatthama who was the brutal killer of her sons, she was feeling sorry for his mother who was widow and would become shelterless.

    Draupadi has the choice not to marry some one whom she did not like, give her space it was her life and she needs to stay with some one whom she is comfortable with.

    In vedic time it was allowed for girls to choose their husband, therefore it is called as “svayam vara” means girls chooses the boy. Of course it was parents duty to give consent to her proper choice and help her marry, not that the parents in the name of being superiors use her as a sacrificial lamb of for their selfish purpose.

    It is very strange for we hindus to have take it easy approach in regards to our holy books. It is better to approach some one who has studied it carefully and applied in his life the teaching of this holy books, they are not only stories but there are many wonderful lessons to be learned and implemented in our life.

    We can emulate so much from Draupadi

    • Chandra

      Can’t agree with you more, brother. One more point that needs to be highlighted here is that Draupadi is no ordinary person. She came from Yajnakunda(ayonija, same as Sitamma) with a specific purpose to marry Arjuna which was her father’s wish. So there is absolutely nothing wrong in having a soft corner(special attention) to Arjuna.
      Of course, it is only appropriate that Yudhishtira alone goes to the heaven alive. So there are reasons attributed to the fall of each character. This is to highlight the importance of Dharma(duty).

  • http://www.marsconsultants.co.in B S Sekhar

    I have heard a different version on Draupadi…. She represents society…and Pandavas & Kauravas also represent different kinds of people in the society.. One believes that he is the best in Darma Sastras, Another believes he is great with his MIGHT; yet other 2 thinks they know everything in the sastras…..like so on.. But Arjuna was a common man – confused, street smart, yet trainable – probably why the leader ( krishna) chose Arjuna to be mentored. When the society ( Draupadi) is misused by the kauravas ( generally bad ones), even the educated, mighty, powerful, learned ones couldn’t do anything……. Yet there is lots of scope of those good people in distress….. Krishna is there. When one doesn’t find any way of escape from the bad ones, this teaches us Surrender…complete surrender to the ultimate.

  • vini

    hi supriya..
    ur rite.krishna told her to reject karna.its also said dat draupadi n karna loved each other secretly though unexpressed.n at d ent she fell down bcoz she had karna deep in her heart.yudhistir was aware of the fact but hid it for d sake of her reputation.(as told in palace of illusions.)

  • Bhanu Prasad Jaiswal

    I also think that Draupadi has soft corner in Her heart for the Mighty Karna…an absolute personality.. imagine What might happens if Ekalavya the Nishad-Raj did not lost his Thumb and present at The Swam-bara of Draupadi…

  • Ashish

    Drapadi loved Arjuna most..quit acceptable eventually he had won the swayamvara..and was considered as “Nara” in that era..!!Although arjuna was never crassly loved any particular woman in his life..

    But was Draupadi sent to hell for that crime?
    I think she could’nt reach swarga alive (“sadeha”) like Yudhisthira did?
    Also I think we need to think about this epics in accordance with its social aspect and try to learn from it as we do from history..what could be the laws and social implications of particular practices may differ with time..but one can not question Draupadi’s stature as respected woman and being Sati(loyal to her husbands)…she is one of those “Prathahsmaraniya kanyas”.

    Stories associating Draupadi and Karna I think are baseless and creations of human minds in search of some kind of “masala” to add to the story..

    Krishna sending Karana again I think is such false story..Krishna has never admired Karna..he only reached him when war was announced and story goes like this that krishna wanted him on pandwa’s side and offered him every thing including draupadi may be true but again the question is did he really wanted karna to be on pandavas side?.. given the fact that krishan was great politician of that era he already knew Karana wont come and wanted to hit the weaken link of karna’s mind ..

    No doubt karna was loyal and danvir. But was he really worthy of praise some time some novelist gave him ?In my opinion he was rather in “AytmaVanchana” as Mr.Pattanik said in his other article that Sri Ram didnt complain abt his exile unlike pandavas..on the same line we can say Karna was complaining and cursing his fortune for he being Soota!!he sat next to people like bhisma,vidur and company no other soota got that opportunity….for what perpose Karna challenged Arjuna? Why he wanted to kill Arjuna at Rangasabha?
    why didn’t he learned some Niti from people like Bhishma and mahatma Vidur..He had respect for them ..often he seems to showcase it while his disagreement with shakuni’s method..but all that seems rather show-off..he was with Duryodhana in search of opportunity to prove that he is great and not Arjuna..what would hav he got after killing arjunas and pandavas..who would have then led foundations of new society that has Dharama as its soul(Krishnas dream of “Dharmashtapana” in bharat varsha …we find Karna always in company of Shakuni ..Other question of What did karna do for Sootas? and were sootas the worst caste considered at time? there were many examples Kshatriya marring soota’s daughters..vis a versa was not true..but certainly they were close to Kshatriya..

    So Krishna considered him as very noble and perfect man is wrong concept…All krishna wanted was peace and Dharma in society ..and to achieve that it was ok for him even if he himself had to reach Krana and see if he can weaken him emotionally just before the war which I think krishna did successfully ..

  • veena

    I admire the character of karna teh most in mahabharata.He gave his kavacha and kundala to Indra knowing fully well that he would become weak.He was in lovewith draupadi.I wonder if he had married draupadi mahabharata would have been very different.

  • http://deepthiramana.tumblr.com/ Deepthi Challa

    Mahabharata is so complex and subject to so many interpretations.

  • Kalyan Majumdar

    I am inclined to think Draupadi dealt with five brothers differently. Her dealing with Yudhisthir cannot be same with Bhim or Sahadev. May be there were five Draupadis within her. Can anyone enlighten me on this aspect? Is there any book or article available? I assume there were five faces of Draupadi. How to find them or describe?

    • Chandra

      Yes, she had to deal with each of them differently depending on the likes and dislikes of each. She explains these traits to Satyabhama. Satyabhama is said to be possessive about Krishna and asks how to keep him in her control. In that context their discussion would be quite relevant even today. I am sure you can get relevant literature on this. Approach your local Dharmic Guru.

  • Sharat

    I am sure all this is just a user manual to guide the society, please dont worry there was nothing called draupadi, mahabharata of arjuna, all are just a character in the thematic user manual

  • Chandra

    Dear Sir,
    How sure are you about ‘sent to hell’ business?

Recent Comments