First City, Mythos, Dec 2007
It is impossible to think of Krishna without thinking of Radha. Theirs is an eternal love story The stuff of romantic songs. And yet, some of the biggest Krishna temples in India do not enshrine the image of Radha. In Puri, Orissa, Krishna is enshrined with his sister, Subhadra, and his brother Balaram. In Udupi, Karnataka, and Guruvayoor, Kerala, and Nathdvara, Rajasthan, Krishna stands alone as a cowherd boy. In Pandharpur, Maharashtra, and Dwarka, Gujarat, he stands alone with the temple of his wife Rukmini nearby. Even the most sacred book of Krishna, the Bhagavat Puran, does not mention Radha. To understand this, we have to looks at the historical development of Krishna worship in India.
It is difficult for many people to accept that religious ideas have a history of their own. The earliest tales of Krishna, found in the Mahabharat, compiled between 300 BC and 300 AD, only refer to, but do not describe, his early life in the village of cowherds. Later around 400 AD, the Harivamsa was added as an appendix to the Mahabharata. This described in detail Krishna’s life in Gokul including his dalliances with milkmaids. But there was no mention of Radha or any particular milkmaid. The women were a collective with whom Krishna danced and sported. The mood was joyful and carnival like. In the Bhagvata Purana, compiled around 10th century in South India, where the idea of devotion to God visualized as Krishna was elaborated, Krishna disappears when the milkmaids become possessive and seek exclusive attention. The idea that God (Krishna) loves all with equal intensity was visually expressed by making the women dance in a circle, each one equidistant from Krishna who stood playing the flute in the centre.
Around this time Prakrit literature started referring to one Radha who was portrayed as Krishna’s favorite. In Hala’s Gatha Saptasati Krishna removes a dust particle, kicked up by cows, from Radha’s eye thus declaring her exalted position in her heart and humbling the other women. In these songs Krishna is not divine; he is a simple cowherd, a hero of the village folk. The songs lack sensual passion and religious ecstasy. Radha is never wife, and the dominant emotion is one of longing following separation, an emotion that eventually characterizes Radha-Krishna relationship.
In the 5th century, the Tamil epic, Shilapadikaram, refers to one Nal-Pinnai who was beloved of Mal (the local name for Krishna). Scholars believe that she represents an early form of Radha. This idea of a favorite milkmaid gradually spread to the North and reached its climax with the composition of the Gita Govinda, a Sanskrit song written by Jayadeva in the 12th century AD where the passion of the cowherd god and his milkmaid beloved was celebrated in a language and style that took all of India by storm.
Jayadeva was born in a village near Puri, Orissa, which is renowned for the grand temple complex of Jagannath, lord of the world, a local form of Krishna. Research has shown that he was involved with Padmavati, a temple dancer or devadasi and perhaps even married her. His work was inspired by both his personal experience and his religious beliefs. Each of Jayadeva’s song is composed of eight couplets known as Ashtapadis. 24 Ashtapadis make a chapter and 12 chapters make up the entire work. In it Krishna is identified as the supreme divine being – a radical shift from earlier scriptures where Krishna is one of the many incarnations of Vishnu. The book uses extremely ornamented language to describe in intimate details Radha’s passion. As one moves from verse to verse, one is transported from the physical realm into the spiritual realm. The erotic longing becomes the cry of the soul for union with the divine. Such an approach was revolutionary; it fired the imagination of the priests and dancers who made it part of the temple ritual. Being a major Vaishnava religious centre, hundreds of pilgrims from all over India poured into Puri. Day and night, they heard the priests sing Jayadeva’s song of Radha’s love for Krishna and the devadasis depict her yearning for her beloved in graceful dance steps. Before long they were mouthing the lyrics and taking it back to their villages. In less than a century, Gita Govinda transformed from a temporal parochial literary work into a pan-Indian sacred scripture. It completely revitalized the Vaishanvism in the subcontinent and catalyzed the rise of the bhakti or devotional movement in India.
Before Jayadeva, love and eroticism revolved around Kama, god of lust, and his consort Rati, goddess of erotics, who were eulogized by poets such as Kalidasa and scholars such as Vatsyayana. With the rise of monastic orders such as Buddhism and Jainism, Kama was demonized into Mara, who had to be conquered by those seeking enlightenment. In the Puranas, stories were told of how Kama was burnt alive when Shiva, the supreme ascetic, opened his third eye. All things sensual came to be seen as fetters that blocked one’s spiritual growth. But Jayadeva changed all that. Through his song he made sensuality and romantic emotion the vehicle of the highest level of spirituality. His Krishna was a reformed Kama. His Radha was a reformed Rati. He turned kama or lust into prema or romance. Krishna’s love for Radha and Radha’s love for Krishna were expressed in physical terms but they communicated a profound mystical experience.
The centuries before the Gita Govinda had seen the collapse of Buddhist orders and an increased stranglehold of Brahminism based on caste hierarchy and ritualism. God was visualized either as an ascetic (Shiva) or a king (Vishnu). With the arrival of Islam from the 8th centuryAD, the exalted status given to ascetics and kings took a beating. Cities were razed to the ground. Poets and artists took shelter in the rural hinterland and there discovered the simple ideologies of the village folk based on love and devotion. It is in this environment that inspired poets such as Jayadeva to shape God as a simple cowherd, accessible through the simplest of emotions, stripped of complex scholarly erudition.
Inspired by Jayadeva, in the 14th and 15th century, poets such as Vidypati and Chandidas further elaborated the relationship of Radha and Krishna. It was always described as turbulent shifting between separation and union, jealousy and surrender. In a rather bold move, these poets saw Radha as a married woman who broke all social norms to be with Krishna. Some folk narratives of this period suggested that she was Krishna’s aunt, married to his maternal uncle. Some said she was older, a mature woman while he was a boy. Even in the Gita Govinda, Radha’s union with Krishna always take place in secret. There is constantly reference to the threat of social disgrace. By making the relationship illicit and clandestine, the poets heightened the emotional quotient of the relationship. It was seen as true love that transcended custom and law. Devotees came to realize that Radha was the symbol of all those who were ‘married’ to social responsibilities, seeking liberation and union with their true love, God, who is Krishna.
Many found use of these extra-marital and incestuous metaphors relationship rather scandalous. They moved towards a different theology in which Radha and Krishna were two halves of the whole. She was the material world; he was the spiritual soul. She was the supreme woman, he was the supreme man. They were Goddess and God whose union gave birth to the universe. The world was seen as Radha, born of Krishna’s delight. She was Krishna’s shakti or power, one who could never be separated from him. This was the svakiya (belonging to Krishna) tradition which distinguished itself from the parakiya (belonging to another) tradition. These were expressed in scriptures such as the Brahma-vaivarta-Purana.
Despite this, across India, Radha is always Krishna’s beloved, never his wife. His wives are Rukmini and Satyabhama. Radha’s relationship is different in nature when compared to Sita’s relationship with Ram. While Ram is the model husband and Sita is the model wife but Krishna and Radha represent the great lovers who were destined never to unite. Perhaps that is why, except in religious orders of the Gangetic planes that follow the svakiya tradition, Radha is never enshrined in a temple.
Scriptures say that worldly responsibilities force Krishna to leave the village of cowherds and go to Mathura and thence to Dwaraka and Kurukshetra. He has to sacrifice the land of pleasure, vilasa bhumi, for the land of duty, karma bhumi. He has to rescue a world which was descending into anarchy – where women such as Draupadi are being gambled away by their husbands. Radha has to be given up. After leaving her, Krishna never plays the flute for Radha was his inspiration. The later Krishna never danced or made music. He is no more the cowherd; he was the charioteer riding into battle.
In time, Radha became a Goddess in her own right. Without her, Krishna was incomplete. She was the medium through which Krishna could be realized. Metaphysically, Radha came to represent the truth of our soul, the unexpressed, unrequited longings of our heart, suppressed by social realities, which cries out to Krishna. Krishna acknowledges this truth of our being, that society denies, each time he dances with Radha at night, outside the village, in secret.



ShareThis
Sourav Roy
Brilliant, beautiful and so lucid. But you know that already.
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 12, 2010 @ 11:45 am
Piyush
Thanks Devdutt for this wonderful article….It partially answers my quetion which I asked you on your article on “Darshan”.
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 12, 2010 @ 5:04 pm
Abhijit
Hi devdutt
Would like to know a bit more about RADHA as a human, some details which can bring out what RADHA means.
There is one saying
The flow of river is called DHARA in Marathi and the one who goes across the flow is called RADHA. The opposite of DHARA.
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 13, 2010 @ 2:01 pm
Krishna
Metaphysically, Radha came to represent the truth of our soul, the unexpressed, unrequited longings of our heart, suppressed by social realities, which cries out to Krishna. Krishna acknowledges this truth of our being, that society denies, each time he dances with Radha at night, outside the village, in secret.
The last explains it all….
Nice, thanks
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 14, 2010 @ 2:51 am
Bindu
very explanatory….somethings that i knew but never pieced together.
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 14, 2010 @ 8:34 am
kalimirch
Hello Devdutt
Where did you get the dates you mentioned? What according to you are the dates of the MB, Buddha, Sankaracharya, Kapila, and Asoka ?
I’ve not dug into all your other articles yet so I would like a straight answer for all to read.
TIA
Regards
[Reply to this comment]
Dr. Devdutt Pattanaik Reply:
January 20th, 2010 at 12:02 am
All available on Google….
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 19, 2010 @ 11:45 pm
Rashmi
Very well presented! a joy to read!….especially loved the last paragraph. Can’t wait to read all the rest of your articles, Devdutt.
Cheers!
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 27, 2010 @ 12:20 am
shravan
hai Devdattuji,
myself shravan, doing my MFA in history of art, Santiniketan. i read ur book myth=mithya and this artical now found it really refreashing, thank u!
sure i will this whole site!!!
bye
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 27, 2010 @ 1:45 pm
saurabh
It is said that unfulfilled love is most beautiful, so is Radha’s. All love legends with union of the lovers somehow end in tragedy. However, the Radha-Krishna legend has always been so intriguing. It was great to read how Jayadev’s renditions popularised this. But it leaves open the question if it is poet’s imagination or reality. A trip down to Vrindavan stamps the authenticity, but article says otherwise. Anyways I believe it is this eternal and purist love that has made Krishna surreal. It also underlines the fact that you can love the lord, be his beloved but cannot possess him in earthly terms.
[Reply to this comment]
Jan 31, 2010 @ 2:58 pm
Akshay
Hi Devdattuji
Thank you for the brilliant article. KM Munshi also takes a similar route when he describes the Radha Krishna relationship although he legitimizes it by stating they are married.
It is an amazing phenomenon that where Radha is missing from all the temple she resides in the heart of most Krishna devotees.
Their love somehow seems to transcend physicality and spirituality and reaches a plane unexplored. Both spiritual love and physical love are selfish since their is a sense of purpose, an ambition involved. When you read or even see a nice painting of Radha Krishna it reminds you about love as it should be. Love which does not exist for a purpose or a reason, love that does not require a social acceptance or a closure, love that exists only because their can be nothing else between them.
Ashok Banker’s Ramayana series has an interesting epilogue where he traces the history or Ramayana and how it dramatically evolved over centuries to the point of being unfaithful from the original telling. Its a pity that we as a society value fiction more than the truth we see before our eyes. Thanks again for the amazing article.
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 01, 2010 @ 4:06 pm
whatisinaname
Dutt saab,
you are super, every article is extremely insightful.
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 02, 2010 @ 3:33 pm
Seby
Dear Devdutt,
Just read your book, Myth = mithya. Pl shed some light on the story of Anay.
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 02, 2010 @ 5:03 pm
anwesh kaushik
dear dev uncle,
i am a a std viii student.i thank u very much for ur article –an oceanic churning– appeared in life positive,feb/2010.as a regular reader of the magazine since last few months i found u the first oriya writer in this magazine.i too have a very keen interest in mythology.
as a am busy in my studies for annual exam,i will write u a long letter later.yours anwesh
[Reply to this comment]
Dr. Devdutt Pattanaik Reply:
February 12th, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Thank you and best wishes
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 11, 2010 @ 3:16 pm
Suraj
Great Article! However, I am somewhat surprised that you didn’t comment on the Alwar poetry that preceded Jayadeva by several centuries, particularly that of Andal and Nammalwar who imagined themselves as gopikas pining for Krishna. While neither mention Radha, the same concepts of yearning and erotic mysticism seem to have been well established in Vaishnavite thought well before Jayadeva’s time or the coming of Islam (at least to the South).
[Reply to this comment]
Dr. Devdutt Pattanaik Reply:
February 12th, 2010 at 7:29 pm
Good point….
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 12, 2010 @ 5:43 am
Bhavesh Karia
brilliant insight as always – a huge fan
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 12, 2010 @ 8:56 pm
raviraj , GMCITE
hi devdutt, just stumbled on your article on ted.com . i remembered the same old student in GMC who had another dimension to think . nice to hear about you . raviraj khairnar.
[Reply to this comment]
Feb 23, 2010 @ 1:31 pm
Guga Saravanan
Hi Devdutt,
I bumped into your article ‘Insecure Mentors’in Economic times and than visited your site and the journey was amazing…….I must admit you are fantastic.
Regards
Guga
[Reply to this comment]
May 08, 2010 @ 8:54 am
Devdutt » Archive » A milkmaid called Radha | Trends Now
[...] Read the original here: Devdutt » Archive » A milkmaid called Radha [...]
Jul 21, 2010 @ 5:25 am